Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooriginal

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Wooriginal.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Just a word invented on some Japanese BBS. Not notable. Meelar 18:49, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.... I can't even tell what the word is supposed to mean. --Starx 19:47, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologism. According to the article, the bulletin board on which it was created is only five years old itself. No Google hits, surprisingly. Andrewa 20:14, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. RickK 20:53, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - needs more support to be a justifiable article - Tεx τ urε 20:54, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is totally incoherent and the word is apparently a recently-forged neologism. DO'Neil 21:27, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Um... what? Delete -- Cyrius|&#9998 21:33, May 16, 2004 (UTC)
Poorly-written, as well as a name that nobody not under the influence of drugs would look up. Delete.Beelzebubs 03:16, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Integrate into 2ch. Ashibaka ✎ 06:17, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. - Lucky 6.9 16:34, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that the best solution is move this article to "List of 2ch-related terms" and arrange style (and POV) for a section. If do so, explanation of "Abone"(deletion), "Cap"(Identification mechanism), "Trip"(Self-Identification), and other 2ch-related words will be able to be added. ja.PiaCarrot 10:59, 2004 May 19 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.