Talk:Spaniards

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spaniards article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 60 days

Skip to table of contents

Spain Top‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Spanish dialects and varieties#Spain|dialects and varieties]] The anchor (#Spain) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled, May 2021

“...following the military conquest of most of the new continent...”

“After the conquest of Mexico and Peru...”

The armies that defeated the Aztecs were comprised mostly by local indigenous enemies, not Europeans, resembling a civil war of sorts. In the end it was a lack of immunity to Old World diseases that wiped out a large portion of the native population, including indigenous allies, in the subsequent years and decades, rather than warfare.

It was these circumstances that allowed Westernized mestizos, who had better immunity due to their partial European ancestry and outnumbered those of European ancestry early in the colonial period, to thrive at their expense and gradually assimilated the indigenous populations across Latin America.

This was a long process and not completely carried out within the 16th century as after the fall of the Aztecs many indigenous populations dispersed across the continent were not under European rule, and remained autonomous for centuries after European colonization began and by then mestizos were the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants in European colonies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.202.192 (talk • contribs) 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Change the name to Spanish People.

Spaniard is an offensive term and the correct form should be Spanish. We have Spanish for Spain natives and Hispanic for all the Spanish speaking people so there's no need to use offensive terms. 144.178.129.245 (talk) 02:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you say that it is offensive? --Jotamar (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Im Spanish and i don't know why it's offensive, could you explain it a bit further, if I may ask? 88.5.24.153 (talk) 08:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 February 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

After the Muslim conquest, the Christian population was reduced to the lowest status, under both Muslims and Jews. 2600:4041:5D8A:9600:C80E:292A:ED43:AFA1 (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is new world diaspora barely counted in the population infobox?

So I noticed that in “regions with significant populations” infobox on the article for the Portuguese people, the 180 million Brazilians who have Portuguese ancestry are counted as Portuguese people. That’s perfectly reasonable, as most articles for ethnicities count diaspora populations. Now, the vast majority of these Portuguese-descended Brazilians also have substantial non-Portuguese heritage mixed in, like European immigrant groups to Brazil that arrived post-independence (mainly Italians, Germans, and Spaniards) and of course African and Indigenous ancestry as well, but that’s ok since most of the enormous Irish diaspora is also mixed and they’re counted as Irish. But when looking at this article for the Spanish people, it seems that Spain’s equally immense diaspora in its former new world colonies is either ignored or grossly underestimated. The great majority of people in Hispanic America from Mexico to Argentina have Spaniard ancestry (mixed to be sure, like the Portuguese diaspora in Brazil) but the highest number for Spaniards in any Hispano-American country listed in the infobox is a tiny 500 thousand. Doesn’t make much sense. 189.6.86.177 (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]